Why it is important for Yorkshire
Yorkshire’s problems are not accidental — they are the result of choices.
For decades, Yorkshire has been underfunded, under-prioritised, and overlooked. Not because we lack potential, but because the system that controls the money and the power is stacked against places like ours.
We see it in the numbers. We see it in transport spending that lags far behind London. We see it in infrastructure projects promised, delayed, scaled back, or cancelled altogether. We see it in local councils pushed to the brink, forced to cut services not because demand has fallen, but because funding has.
And underfunding doesn’t stay neatly in budget spreadsheets.
It spreads — into everyday life.
It means unreliable transport that limits where people can work.
It means high streets hollowed out while investment flows elsewhere.
It means schools, NHS services, and social care stretched to breaking point.
It means talented young people leaving Yorkshire, not because they want to, but because opportunity has been drained away. And when those decisions go wrong, who pays the price? not Westminster, Yorkshire does.
When power is distant, accountability disappears. Local leaders are forced to manage decline instead of creating prosperity. Communities are told to “do more with less” while watching other regions surge ahead with investment we can only dream of.
A self-governed Yorkshire would mean control over our priorities — not handouts, not begging rounds, but fair funding and local decision-making.
It would mean investing in transport so that Yorkshire can function. Backing industries that already thrive here instead of chasing London-centric models. Funding public services based on need, not party political convenience.
Most importantly, it would mean ending the cycle where Yorkshire is expected to cope quietly while others prosper loudly.